Triple
T18381161
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Putna River |
E446447
|
entity |
| Predicate | flowsThrough |
P225
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Vicovu de Sus |
E1128271
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Vicovu de Sus | Statement: [Putna River, flowsThrough, Vicovu de Sus]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Vicovu de Sus Context triple: [Putna River, flowsThrough, Vicovu de Sus]
-
A.
Vicovu de Sus
chosen
Vicovu de Sus is a small town in northern Romania, known for its location near the border with Ukraine in the historical region of Bukovina.
-
B.
Vulcănești
Vulcănești is a town in southern Moldova that serves as one of the key urban centers of the autonomous region of Gagauzia.
-
C.
Făgăraș
Făgăraș is a town in central Romania, situated near the Făgăraș Mountains in Transylvania and known for its historic fortress and scenic surroundings.
-
D.
Râșnov
Râșnov is a Romanian town in Transylvania best known for its medieval hilltop fortress and scenic location near Brașov and the Carpathian Mountains.
-
E.
Comănești
Comănești is a town in Bacău County, Romania, known for its location in the Trotuș Valley and its historical role in the region’s timber and coal industries.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9f370b88190b1e5081c2c238e7f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e5179b60f88190adf39e85375bd11b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 5:57 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a03d780a3bc8190a2ae02e8190dfb68 |
completed | May 13, 2026, 1:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:45 a.m.