Triple

T18112080
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Marinship shipyards E433502 entity
Predicate legalCaseAssociated P17092 FINISHED
Object James v. Marinship Corp.
James v. Marinship Corp. is a landmark 1944 California Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory union practices in a wartime shipyard unlawful, advancing civil rights and fair employment principles.
E1307251 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (5 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: James v. Marinship Corp. | Statement: [Marinship shipyards, legalCaseAssociated, James v. Marinship Corp.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: James v. Marinship Corp.
Context triple: [Marinship shipyards, legalCaseAssociated, James v. Marinship Corp.]
  • A. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
    Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
  • B. United States v. Carroll Towing Co.
    United States v. Carroll Towing Co. is a landmark 1947 U.S. federal court case famous for Judge Learned Hand’s formulation of the “Hand formula” for determining negligence in tort law.
  • C. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
    Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer is a landmark 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential power by ruling that President Truman lacked authority to seize steel mills during the Korean War without congressional approval.
  • D. Huus v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.
    Huus v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co. is a U.S. Supreme Court case associated with the Insular Cases that addressed legal issues arising from the status and governance of newly acquired American territories.
  • E. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
    MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: James v. Marinship Corp.
Triple: [Marinship shipyards, legalCaseAssociated, James v. Marinship Corp.]
Generated description
James v. Marinship Corp. is a landmark 1944 California Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory union practices in a wartime shipyard unlawful, advancing civil rights and fair employment principles.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: James v. Marinship Corp.
Target entity description: James v. Marinship Corp. is a landmark 1944 California Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory union practices in a wartime shipyard unlawful, advancing civil rights and fair employment principles.
  • A. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
    Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
  • B. United States v. Carroll Towing Co.
    United States v. Carroll Towing Co. is a landmark 1947 U.S. federal court case famous for Judge Learned Hand’s formulation of the “Hand formula” for determining negligence in tort law.
  • C. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
    Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer is a landmark 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential power by ruling that President Truman lacked authority to seize steel mills during the Korean War without congressional approval.
  • D. Huus v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.
    Huus v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co. is a U.S. Supreme Court case associated with the Insular Cases that addressed legal issues arising from the status and governance of newly acquired American territories.
  • E. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
    MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
  • F. None of above. chosen
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseAssociated
Context triple: [Marinship shipyards, legalCaseAssociated, James v. Marinship Corp.]
  • A. legalCaseRelatedTo
    Indicates that there is a relevant connection or association between a legal case and another entity, such as a person, organization, event, or legal matter.
  • B. legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
    Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
  • C. associatedCourtCase chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
  • D. legalCaseAlongside
    Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
  • E. legalCase
    Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (6 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8b90916008190a1f110bd7ced5473 completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e4ddd3422c81908396a21bd53f3e47 completed April 19, 2026, 1:51 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a037c3b95b481909fe58450f007544e completed May 12, 2026, 7:15 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_6a037db328b08190b003da3980076ecf completed May 12, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_6a037e99ae98819087afa088fb42e847 completed May 12, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e43313ca788190baa224269e71de49 completed April 19, 2026, 1:42 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:28 a.m.