Triple
T17730515
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California Rancheria Act |
E442571
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tillie Hardwick v. United States |
E1284916
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tillie Hardwick v. United States | Statement: [California Rancheria Act, relatedTo, Tillie Hardwick v. United States]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tillie Hardwick v. United States Context triple: [California Rancheria Act, relatedTo, Tillie Hardwick v. United States]
-
A.
Tillie Hardwick v. United States settlement
chosen
The Tillie Hardwick v. United States settlement was a landmark legal agreement that restored federal recognition and associated rights to several California Indian rancherias whose status had been terminated under mid-20th-century U.S. Indian policy.
-
B.
Durousseau v. United States
Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
-
C.
United States v. Comstock
United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
-
D.
Wright v. United States
Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
-
E.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8b9ec79688190b86bdcef85a7b3aa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e478e69f288190900027641952f198 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a02efaf24d48190a535eba40ae33443 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 10:08 a.m.