Triple

T17122623
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rochin v. California E415505 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Rochin v. People of the State of California E415505 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rochin v. People of the State of California | Statement: [Rochin v. California, fullName, Rochin v. People of the State of California]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Rochin v. People of the State of California
Context triple: [Rochin v. California, fullName, Rochin v. People of the State of California]
  • A. Rochin v. California chosen
    Rochin v. California is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that held evidence obtained by methods that "shock the conscience," such as forcibly pumping a suspect’s stomach, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • B. Cohen v. California
    Cohen v. California is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly expanded First Amendment protections for offensive and provocative speech in public settings.
  • C. Giles v. California
    Giles v. California is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the Confrontation Clause by holding that a defendant forfeits the right to confront a witness only if the defendant intended to prevent that witness from testifying.
  • D. Griffin v. California
    Griffin v. California is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that prosecutors and judges may not comment on a criminal defendant’s failure to testify, as this violates the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
  • E. Edwards v. California
    Edwards v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a California law restricting the bringing of indigent persons into the state, holding that such limits on interstate movement violated the Commerce Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886d090cc8190a39cb94992586905 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3e80ac2cc819084fab829917c950a completed April 18, 2026, 8:22 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a013a1062fc8190b1c4e97f42cf3faa completed May 11, 2026, 2:08 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:36 a.m.