Triple
T15834001
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | DASH |
E383939
|
entity |
| Predicate | isElectronicTradingEnabled |
P119831
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [DASH, isElectronicTradingEnabled, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isElectronicTradingEnabled Context triple: [DASH, isElectronicTradingEnabled, true]
-
A.
isElectronicTradingEligible
Indicates that an entity meets the required conditions to participate in or be processed through electronic trading.
-
B.
hasElectronicTradingSystem
Indicates that an entity operates or utilizes an electronic system for executing trades or transactions.
-
C.
isElectronicTradingSymbol
Indicates that one entity is the electronic trading symbol (e.g., ticker used in electronic markets) associated with another entity.
-
D.
electronicTradingPlatform
Indicates a relationship where financial instruments are bought and sold through an electronic trading system or marketplace rather than via traditional manual or floor-based methods.
-
E.
supportsTradingType
Indicates that one entity enables, allows, or is compatible with a specified type or mode of trading.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da34c888190976e06c4019d415a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e11e6670d48190a456581dd951f168 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e005418f588190824d91ff7974dada |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e007647f908190adb178c68c7bb7cf |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:49 a.m.