Triple
T15258520
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fassa Valley |
E364710
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMinorityLanguage |
P2267
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ladin |
E23172
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ladin | Statement: [Fassa Valley, hasMinorityLanguage, Ladin]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ladin Context triple: [Fassa Valley, hasMinorityLanguage, Ladin]
-
A.
Ladinian
The Ladinian is a Middle Triassic geologic age and stage characterized by significant marine sedimentation and the diversification of early Mesozoic life.
-
B.
Ladin language
chosen
Ladin language is a Rhaeto-Romance language spoken primarily in the Dolomite mountain region of northern Italy.
-
C.
Segestani
The Segestani were an ancient Illyrian tribe that inhabited the region around the city of Siscia in what is now central Croatia.
-
D.
Ladin people
The Ladin people are a Rhaeto-Romance ethnic group native to the Dolomite mountain region of northern Italy, known for their distinct Ladin language and alpine cultural traditions.
-
E.
Lepontic language
The Lepontic language is an extinct ancient Celtic language once spoken in parts of northern Italy and southern Switzerland, known primarily from short inscriptions.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0f08408190b3c3259ae35d79d2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0084d11148190919eef8e55569bb9 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fee5f9a0708190bc429692788a63d7 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:13 a.m.