Triple
T15238843
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Meade County, South Dakota |
E364199
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUnincorporatedCommunity |
P6345
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Enning, South Dakota
Enning, South Dakota is a small rural unincorporated community located in Meade County in western South Dakota.
|
E1198392
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Enning, South Dakota | Statement: [Meade County, South Dakota, hasUnincorporatedCommunity, Enning, South Dakota]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Enning, South Dakota Context triple: [Meade County, South Dakota, hasUnincorporatedCommunity, Enning, South Dakota]
-
A.
Turton, South Dakota
Turton, South Dakota is a small rural town located in northeastern South Dakota within Spink County.
-
B.
Britton, South Dakota
Britton, South Dakota is a small city in northeastern South Dakota that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of the surrounding rural region.
-
C.
Renner, South Dakota
Renner, South Dakota is an unincorporated community and census-designated place located just north of Sioux Falls in eastern South Dakota.
-
D.
Seneca, South Dakota
Seneca, South Dakota is a small rural town located in Faulk County in the north-central region of the state.
-
E.
Humboldt, South Dakota
Humboldt, South Dakota is a small rural town in eastern South Dakota located just west of Sioux Falls.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Enning, South Dakota Triple: [Meade County, South Dakota, hasUnincorporatedCommunity, Enning, South Dakota]
Generated description
Enning, South Dakota is a small rural unincorporated community located in Meade County in western South Dakota.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Enning, South Dakota Target entity description: Enning, South Dakota is a small rural unincorporated community located in Meade County in western South Dakota.
-
A.
Turton, South Dakota
Turton, South Dakota is a small rural town located in northeastern South Dakota within Spink County.
-
B.
Britton, South Dakota
Britton, South Dakota is a small city in northeastern South Dakota that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of the surrounding rural region.
-
C.
Renner, South Dakota
Renner, South Dakota is an unincorporated community and census-designated place located just north of Sioux Falls in eastern South Dakota.
-
D.
Seneca, South Dakota
Seneca, South Dakota is a small rural town located in Faulk County in the north-central region of the state.
-
E.
Humboldt, South Dakota
Humboldt, South Dakota is a small rural town in eastern South Dakota located just west of Sioux Falls.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a0dde7481908fc64d1e82d5d20d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e007da7e988190925a9b67b8070bc7 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:49 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fff78dab488190a89b9eb4f648b36c |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69fffb6d9f90819095c5d1a70b5c90a3 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:28 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69fffbc0376c8190a9cae5dc3d941471 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:12 a.m.