Triple

T15152593
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject William VII of Chalon-Arlay E361982 entity
Predicate territoryHeld P28640 FINISHED
Object lands in Franche-Comté LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lands in Franche-Comté | Statement: [William VII of Chalon-Arlay, territoryHeld, lands in Franche-Comté]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: territoryHeld
Context triple: [William VII of Chalon-Arlay, territoryHeld, lands in Franche-Comté]
  • A. heldTerritory chosen
    Indicates that one entity maintained control or possession over a specific territory or geographic area.
  • B. gainedTerritory
    Indicates that one entity has acquired control over additional land or area from another entity or from a neutral state.
  • C. acquiredTerritoryBy
    Indicates a relationship where one entity gains control or ownership of a territory through a specific means, event, or process.
  • D. acquiredTerritoryFrom
    Indicates that one entity gained control or ownership of a territory that previously belonged to another entity.
  • E. hasTerritorialPossession
    Indicates that one entity holds ownership, control, or legal rights over a specific territory or geographic area.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a0759908190b8a051d2e2a1cbe6 completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e00609040081908c849475a2fa6443 completed April 15, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deb9779acc81908ed2dad382c42dca completed April 14, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:07 a.m.