Triple

T14692560
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Libya situation at the ICC E345069 entity
Predicate complementarityIssue P115373 FINISHED
Object overlap with Libyan national proceedings LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: overlap with Libyan national proceedings | Statement: [Libya situation at the ICC, complementarityIssue, overlap with Libyan national proceedings]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: complementarityIssue
Context triple: [Libya situation at the ICC, complementarityIssue, overlap with Libyan national proceedings]
  • A. complement
    Indicates that one entity completes, enhances, or makes another entity whole or more effective by providing what it lacks.
  • B. complements
    Indicates that one entity enhances, completes, or improves another by providing qualities or functions that fit well together.
  • C. requiresComplement
    Indicates that one entity depends on another entity as a necessary complement to be complete, functional, or valid.
  • D. relatesComplementTo
    Indicates that one entity serves as a complement or completing counterpart to another entity within a specified context or structure.
  • E. consistentWith
    Indicates that one entity does not contradict and is compatible or in agreement with another entity, condition, or set of constraints.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822e34b348190ada4d1cdb6c7c226 completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69deb585d46c81908d6964130914cec4 completed April 14, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de6579fb7881909becc8f5822b39d4 completed April 14, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de716d3aac8190aaa6dc1f099b86e8 completed April 14, 2026, 4:55 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:28 a.m.