Triple
T14578188
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mitchell, Iowa |
E342112
|
entity |
| Predicate | isCommunityWithin |
P41531
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mitchell County, Iowa |
E56902
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mitchell County, Iowa | Statement: [Mitchell, Iowa, isCommunityWithin, Mitchell County, Iowa]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isCommunityWithin Context triple: [Mitchell, Iowa, isCommunityWithin, Mitchell County, Iowa]
-
A.
isCommunityOf
Indicates that one entity functions as a community composed of, or defined by, the members or elements represented by the other entity.
-
B.
isCommunityBy
Indicates that something functions as or is recognized as a community defined or established by a particular agent or source.
-
C.
isRemoteCommunity
Indicates that a community is geographically isolated or distant from urban centers and services.
-
D.
hasNearbyCommunity
Indicates that one entity has another community located close to it in geographic or spatial terms.
-
E.
hasCommunityArea
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, located in, or belongs to a particular community area.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822dcc6248190bed689984bceb0e2 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69deb3f5ec448190b2ef887fdf7b633e |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:39 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a2b9448def48190b948c9f4dd6a0fa5 |
completed | June 12, 2026, 5:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de656a953481909a4645b004c40de7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 4:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:24 a.m.