Triple

T13937094
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Percival E335146 entity
Predicate failsAtFirst P111858 FINISHED
Object asking the Grail Question LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: asking the Grail Question | Statement: [Percival, failsAtFirst, asking the Grail Question]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: failsAtFirst
Context triple: [Percival, failsAtFirst, asking the Grail Question]
  • A. failsWhen
    Indicates that a particular action, process, or condition does not succeed under the specified circumstances or triggers.
  • B. failedOn
    Indicates that an attempted action or process did not succeed when applied to a specific target, condition, or step.
  • C. failsInGeneralFor
    Indicates that an action, method, or approach does not succeed under typical or broad conditions, rather than only in specific edge cases.
  • D. failureCause
    Indicates that one event, condition, or factor is the reason or source that caused a particular failure to occur.
  • E. possibleFirstInfall
    Indicates that an event or action could represent the earliest occurrence of an error, failure, or incorrect state in a process or system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c5f739081908bc05b2461f54828 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de2cf42878819085146670d7b92605 completed April 14, 2026, 12:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbc873052c8190b33ff7f7c5a4e7ee completed April 12, 2026, 4:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dcad0fc42c8190ada203febd57e851 completed April 13, 2026, 8:45 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:17 p.m.