Triple
T13772169
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dentdale |
E330906
|
entity |
| Predicate | watercourse |
P415
|
FINISHED |
| Object | River Dee (Dentdale) |
E479546
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: River Dee (Dentdale) | Statement: [Dentdale, watercourse, River Dee (Dentdale)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: River Dee (Dentdale) Context triple: [Dentdale, watercourse, River Dee (Dentdale)]
-
A.
River Dee, Dentdale
chosen
River Dee, Dentdale is a small upland river in Cumbria, England, flowing through the scenic Dentdale valley in the Yorkshire Dales.
-
B.
Dart Brook
Dart Brook is a minor river in New South Wales, Australia, that forms part of the Hunter River catchment.
-
C.
Coquet Burn
Coquet Burn is a small tributary stream in Northumberland, England, that feeds into the River Coquet within the county’s rural landscape.
-
D.
Tynedale
Tynedale is a historic valley and district in northern England centered on the River Tyne, known for its rural landscapes, market towns, and Roman heritage.
-
E.
River Grizedale
River Grizedale is a small river in Lancashire, England, that flows through rural valleys before joining the River Wyre.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c583b0081909e408a17db517a21 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de0235aea881909ab4c721db081b00 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f7a86907cc8190a6a6b475d08f0dc7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:56 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:10 p.m.