Triple
T13349497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory |
E318034
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ashland, Oregon |
E310213
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ashland, Oregon | Statement: [National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory, locatedIn, Ashland, Oregon]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ashland, Oregon Context triple: [National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory, locatedIn, Ashland, Oregon]
-
A.
Ashland, Oregon
chosen
Ashland, Oregon is a small city in southern Oregon best known for its vibrant arts scene and the renowned Oregon Shakespeare Festival.
-
B.
Ashland
Ashland is a small town in northern Mississippi that serves as the administrative and cultural center of Benton County.
-
C.
Ashland
Ashland is a Chicago 'L' rapid transit station on the CTA's Pink Line serving the city's Near West Side.
-
D.
Ashland
Ashland is an unincorporated community in Alameda County, California, situated in the East Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area.
-
E.
Ashland
Ashland is a small borough in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, historically known for its anthracite coal mining heritage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d99e8b28e48190a23194e03a74b41b |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f74615b0f08190a8eb8d8a87cb7053 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:31 p.m.