Triple
T12562317
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | VisualWorks |
E295379
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsDebuggingTools |
P105440
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [VisualWorks, supportsDebuggingTools, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsDebuggingTools Context triple: [VisualWorks, supportsDebuggingTools, true]
-
A.
supportsDeviceChaining
Indicates that one device can be connected in sequence with others, allowing multiple devices to operate together in a chained configuration.
-
B.
supportsADB
Indicates that one entity is capable of operating with, providing, or being compatible with Android Debug Bridge (ADB) functionality for another entity.
-
C.
supportsRemoteTerminal
Indicates that one entity provides or enables access to another entity via a remote terminal interface.
-
D.
supportsDeveloper
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or advocacy to help a developer perform their work or achieve their goals.
-
E.
hasSoftwareCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one software system can operate correctly and effectively with another software system, without conflicts or required modifications.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ad9cac2c81908e8a7bed82d1e21d |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9550d84908190aea0f50055f6d92e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d95414692881909c52a1de7d224b44 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d9550af6d48190a40e349ed0424be3 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 11:48 p.m.