Triple
T12562314
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | VisualWorks |
E295379
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsImageBasedDevelopment |
P105438
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [VisualWorks, supportsImageBasedDevelopment, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsImageBasedDevelopment Context triple: [VisualWorks, supportsImageBasedDevelopment, true]
-
A.
isFeatureBased
Indicates that one entity is derived from, determined by, or constructed using the characteristics or attributes of another entity.
-
B.
developedWith
Indicates that something was created, built, or produced using a specified tool, technology, method, or collaborator.
-
C.
supportsDeveloper
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or advocacy to help a developer perform their work or achieve their goals.
-
D.
supportsDevelopmentLanguage
Indicates that one entity provides compatibility with, tools for, or the ability to use a particular programming or development language.
-
E.
hasDevelopmentSystem
Indicates that one entity possesses, uses, or is associated with a particular system, platform, or environment used for development activities.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ad9cac2c81908e8a7bed82d1e21d |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9550d84908190aea0f50055f6d92e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d95414692881909c52a1de7d224b44 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d9550af6d48190a40e349ed0424be3 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 11:48 p.m.