Triple
T12513228
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A. Alfred Taubman |
E299132
|
entity |
| Predicate | familyName |
P18
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Taubman |
E299133
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Taubman | Statement: [A. Alfred Taubman, familyName, Taubman]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Taubman Context triple: [A. Alfred Taubman, familyName, Taubman]
-
A.
Taubman
chosen
Taubman is a surname most prominently associated with A. Alfred Taubman, the influential American real estate developer and philanthropist known for pioneering the modern shopping mall.
-
B.
Tishman
Tishman is a prominent American real estate family name associated with major development and construction firms, particularly in New York City.
-
C.
Brownstone
Brownstone was a 1990s American R&B girl group best known for their soulful harmonies and the hit single "If You Love Me."
-
D.
Newmark
Newmark is a prominent commercial real estate services firm known for brokerage, property management, and advisory work on landmark buildings and major properties.
-
E.
Burdine
Burdine is the respondent in the U.S. Supreme Court employment discrimination case Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, which clarified the burden of proof framework in Title VII disparate treatment claims.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ada4cd388190ae3bbf83ff87057a |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9541e752c8190bf12d2b5a37b53df |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f64bbba5fc819082a4171a5a77183a |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.