Triple
T12178999
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cayman Islands Government |
E290166
|
entity |
| Predicate | ukRetainedResponsibility |
P58929
|
FINISHED |
| Object | defence |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defence | Statement: [Cayman Islands Government, ukRetainedResponsibility, defence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ukRetainedResponsibility Context triple: [Cayman Islands Government, ukRetainedResponsibility, defence]
-
A.
responsibleFor
Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
-
B.
stateResponsibilityAcknowledgedBy
Indicates that a state’s responsibility for a particular act, situation, or obligation is formally recognized or accepted by a specified party.
-
C.
retained
Indicates that one entity keeps possession, control, or continued engagement of another entity over a period of time.
-
D.
reallocatedResponsibilityFrom
Indicates that responsibility for something was transferred away from one party and assigned to another.
-
E.
UKRetainsResponsibilityFor
chosen
Indicates that the United Kingdom continues to hold authority, control, or accountability for a matter, function, or obligation despite any changes in other arrangements or parties involved.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab64de5881908d56eb7a75c6cc69 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d91a83012c81908d04bbab5fdcd8c2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d91510a258819090ef8fbdc2d8707b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.