Triple
T11805917
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saitama Prefecture |
E280745
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRiver |
P165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Iruma River |
E945099
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Iruma River | Statement: [Saitama Prefecture, hasRiver, Iruma River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Iruma River Context triple: [Saitama Prefecture, hasRiver, Iruma River]
-
A.
Iruma River
chosen
The Iruma River is a river in Japan that flows through Saitama Prefecture and joins the larger Arakawa River system.
-
B.
Inagawa River
The Inagawa River is a river in Japan’s Kansai region that flows through Hyōgo Prefecture, including the city of Amagasaki, before emptying into Osaka Bay.
-
C.
Shakujii River
Shakujii River is a tributary of the Arakawa River flowing through western and northern Tokyo, known for its urban green corridors and riverside parks.
-
D.
Yoshida River
The Yoshida River is a significant waterway flowing through Japan’s Miyagi Prefecture, contributing to the region’s natural landscape and local ecosystems.
-
E.
Kumagawa River
Kumagawa River is a major river in Japan’s Kyushu region known for its fast currents, scenic gorges, and frequent flooding.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab26aae88190b2489efcb2a24234 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a5c8324481909a54852a9bb714e0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fcdee6798c8190b2b47082cf0c32fb |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:42 p.m.