Triple
T11160525
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Picaboo |
E264022
|
entity |
| Predicate | reasonForRebranding |
P6009
|
FINISHED |
| Object | trademark dispute |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trademark dispute | Statement: [Picaboo, reasonForRebranding, trademark dispute]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reasonForRebranding Context triple: [Picaboo, reasonForRebranding, trademark dispute]
-
A.
reasonForRedesign
Indicates the underlying cause, motivation, or justification for performing a redesign.
-
B.
announcedRebrandingAs
Indicates that one entity has publicly declared it will change its name, brand, or identity to that of another entity.
-
C.
focusAfterRebrand
Indicates that an entity’s primary emphasis, strategy, or positioning is considered in the period following a rebranding effort.
-
D.
reasonForChange
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the cause, justification, or motivation for a modification or change in another entity or state.
-
E.
brandingGoal
Indicates the strategic objective or desired outcome that an entity aims to achieve through its branding efforts.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa9ccddc8190868998c8b7beb060 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7e8817a90819087820d5241c58851 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d75cec26fc8190a5497d186306f935 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:29 p.m.