Triple
T10991551
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Henstock–Kurzweil integral |
E259763
|
entity |
| Predicate | admitsExtensionTo |
P1673
|
FINISHED |
| Object | improper integrals over unbounded intervals |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: improper integrals over unbounded intervals | Statement: [Henstock–Kurzweil integral, admitsExtensionTo, improper integrals over unbounded intervals]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: admitsExtensionTo Context triple: [Henstock–Kurzweil integral, admitsExtensionTo, improper integrals over unbounded intervals]
-
A.
definesExtension
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the extension, scope, or detailed form of another entity.
-
B.
supportsExtensionsFrom
Indicates that one entity is capable of recognizing, loading, or interoperating with extensions originating from another entity.
-
C.
hasExtensionBy
Indicates that one entity is extended, augmented, or further developed by another entity.
-
D.
extendsTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity reaches, stretches, or continues its scope, influence, or coverage up to or into another entity.
-
E.
formerExtension
Indicates that one entity previously served as an extension or subsidiary part of another entity, but no longer holds that status.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa8a6a548190a750f944ccdc8064 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d795d1e918819090c71f5a077fa15a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d72e93ac648190b46c5d12bf3eb1e9 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 4:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:24 p.m.