Triple

T10826184
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject PEP 8016 E255502 entity
Predicate definesCouncilPowers P95939 FINISHED
Object interpretation of PEPs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: interpretation of PEPs | Statement: [PEP 8016, definesCouncilPowers, interpretation of PEPs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesCouncilPowers
Context triple: [PEP 8016, definesCouncilPowers, interpretation of PEPs]
  • A. hasLegislativePower
    Indicates that an entity possesses the authority to create, amend, or repeal laws within a given jurisdiction or governing framework.
  • B. constitutionalPowersExercisedBy
    Indicates that certain powers or authorities defined by a constitution are carried out or exercised by a specified actor or institution.
  • C. intendedPowers
    Indicates that one entity is meant or designed to have certain powers, authorities, or capabilities in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. constitutionalPower
    Indicates that an entity holds authority or rights granted and defined by a constitution in relation to another entity or domain of action.
  • E. definedAtCouncil
    Indicates that something was formally established, decided, or codified during a council or official deliberative meeting.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa8081448190a9324184f2bd1c26 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d734d1c24881909f56d56207cccbef completed April 9, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d70d1bf3648190b36fa96ea018e0dc completed April 9, 2026, 2:21 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d7101c96708190808fef73199e8482 completed April 9, 2026, 2:34 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:19 p.m.