Triple
T10342029
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amsterdam Treaty |
E243147
|
entity |
| Predicate | strengthenedPolicyArea |
P93789
|
FINISHED |
| Object | common foreign and security policy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: common foreign and security policy | Statement: [Amsterdam Treaty, strengthenedPolicyArea, common foreign and security policy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: strengthenedPolicyArea Context triple: [Amsterdam Treaty, strengthenedPolicyArea, common foreign and security policy]
-
A.
emphasizesPolicyArea
Indicates that one entity gives particular importance or priority to a specific policy area in its actions, statements, or focus.
-
B.
commonPolicyArea
Indicates that two entities share the same policy domain, topic, or area of regulatory or legislative focus.
-
C.
isPartOfPolicyArea
Indicates that one policy, topic, or issue belongs to, falls under, or is categorized within a broader policy area or domain.
-
D.
implementsPolicyArea
Indicates that an entity carries out, enforces, or operationalizes a specific policy area in practice.
-
E.
supportsPolicyArea
Indicates that one entity endorses, advocates for, or is in favor of a particular policy area or domain of public policy.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381af787481908bc401325c760a88 |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d4e91fdb2081909866c6ecf417d75a |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4df9dc3208190bf1bd106f44f6202 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 10:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d4e91ce2008190af252c140370b7f2 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 11:55 a.m.