Triple
T10122974
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | William Bligh |
E223342
|
entity |
| Predicate | appointedAsGovernorOfNewSouthWales |
P92101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1806 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1806 | Statement: [William Bligh, appointedAsGovernorOfNewSouthWales, 1806]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appointedAsGovernorOfNewSouthWales Context triple: [William Bligh, appointedAsGovernorOfNewSouthWales, 1806]
-
A.
successorAsGovernorOfNewSouthWales
Indicates that one person assumed the role of Governor of New South Wales directly after another person, succeeding them in that office.
-
B.
endOfTermAsGovernorGeneralOfAustralia
Indicates the date or point in time when an individual’s tenure as Governor-General of Australia concludes.
-
C.
becameStateOfAustralia
Indicates that an entity transitioned into and was formally recognized as a state within the Commonwealth of Australia.
-
D.
precededBy (as Premier of Victoria)
Indicates that one individual previously held the position of Premier of Victoria before another individual.
-
E.
succeededBy (as Premier of Victoria)
Indicates that one individual directly followed another in holding the office of Premier of Victoria.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8422047c81909d66b717b8b18cf3 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdd2ea7fe88190acb08d292a794638 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 2:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd4ba1d360819087698d04a53cc87e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 4:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd4fed19d481909d2c7ff1114664b6 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 5:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 9:05 p.m.