R v. Marshall (1999)
E980807
UNEXPLORED
R v. Marshall (1999) is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that affirmed Mi'kmaq treaty rights to fish and hunt for a moderate livelihood based on 18th-century Peace and Friendship Treaties.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| R v Marshall | 2 |
| R v. Marshall (1999) canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T12407403 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: R v. Marshall (1999) Context triple: [Peace and Friendship Treaties, referencedIn, R v. Marshall (1999)]
-
A.
R v Oakes
R v Oakes is a landmark 1986 Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the proportionality framework used to justify limits on rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
-
B.
R v McIlkenny and others
R v McIlkenny and others is the criminal case in which the men later known as the Birmingham Six were controversially convicted in 1975 for the Birmingham pub bombings, convictions that were ultimately quashed in 1991.
-
C.
R (Jackson) v Attorney General
R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
-
D.
R. v. Lavell
R. v. Lavell is a landmark 1974 Supreme Court of Canada decision that addressed sex discrimination in the Indian Act and tested the scope and effectiveness of the Canadian Bill of Rights in protecting equality rights.
-
E.
X v. Rex
X v. Rex is a classic detective novel by Philip MacDonald featuring a tense murder investigation and intricate courtroom drama.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: R v. Marshall (1999) Target entity description: R v. Marshall (1999) is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that affirmed Mi'kmaq treaty rights to fish and hunt for a moderate livelihood based on 18th-century Peace and Friendship Treaties.
-
A.
R v Oakes
R v Oakes is a landmark 1986 Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the proportionality framework used to justify limits on rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
-
B.
R v McIlkenny and others
R v McIlkenny and others is the criminal case in which the men later known as the Birmingham Six were controversially convicted in 1975 for the Birmingham pub bombings, convictions that were ultimately quashed in 1991.
-
C.
R (Jackson) v Attorney General
R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
-
D.
R. v. Lavell
R. v. Lavell is a landmark 1974 Supreme Court of Canada decision that addressed sex discrimination in the Indian Act and tested the scope and effectiveness of the Canadian Bill of Rights in protecting equality rights.
-
E.
X v. Rex
X v. Rex is a classic detective novel by Philip MacDonald featuring a tense murder investigation and intricate courtroom drama.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (3)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
linked to: R v. Marshall (1999)
linked to: R v. Marshall (1999)