European proportionality doctrine

E909180

The European proportionality doctrine is a legal principle developed in European constitutional and human rights law that requires state measures limiting rights to be suitable, necessary, and balanced in relation to their legitimate aims.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
European proportionality doctrine canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf legal doctrine ⓘ
principle of constitutional law ⓘ
principle of human rights law ⓘ
aimsTo ensure fair balance between individual and community interests ⓘ
prevent excessive state interference with rights ⓘ
appliedInCaseLawOf Court of Justice of the European Union free movement cases ⓘ
Court of Justice of the European Union fundamental freedoms cases ⓘ
European Court of Human Rights Article 10 jurisprudence ⓘ
European Court of Human Rights Article 11 jurisprudence ⓘ
European Court of Human Rights Article 8 jurisprudence ⓘ
appliesIn European constitutional law ⓘ
European human rights law ⓘ
appliesTo administrative measures ⓘ
judicial measures affecting rights ⓘ
legislative measures ⓘ
limitations of fundamental rights ⓘ
restrictions on civil liberties ⓘ
centralTo European rights limitation analysis ⓘ
contrastedWith American rational basis review ⓘ
developedIn 20th century ⓘ
hasAlternativeName European principle of proportionality ⓘ
principle of proportionality in Europe ⓘ
hasComponent necessity test ⓘ
proportionality stricto sensu test ⓘ
suitability test ⓘ
influenced constitutional jurisprudence of EU member states ⓘ
rights adjudication in the Council of Europe system ⓘ
influencedBy German Verhältnismäßigkeitsprinzip ⓘ
linked to: German law
originatedIn German constitutional law ⓘ
relatedTo EU Charter of Fundamental Rights ⓘ
European Convention on Human Rights ⓘ
margin of appreciation doctrine ⓘ
requires balancing between individual rights and public interests ⓘ
legitimate aim for any rights restriction ⓘ
proportionality between means and ends ⓘ
state measures be necessary among less restrictive alternatives ⓘ
state measures be suitable to achieve their aim ⓘ
state measures pursue a legitimate aim ⓘ
requiresAssessmentOf least restrictive means ⓘ
suitability of the measure ⓘ
weighing of competing interests ⓘ
usedBy Court of Justice of the European Union ⓘ
European Court of Human Rights ⓘ
constitutional courts of EU member states ⓘ
usedFor judicial review of state action ⓘ
review of administrative discretion ⓘ
review of legislative discretion ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Oakes test → influencedBy → European proportionality doctrine ⓘ