Bagosora exercised de facto authority over the Rwandan military after the president’s assassination in April 1994
E846006
Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora is a landmark case before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda concerning the criminal responsibility of a senior Rwandan military officer for his role in the 1994 genocide.
All labels observed (2)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T10170610 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bagosora exercised de facto authority over the Rwandan military after the president’s assassination in April 1994 Context triple: [Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora, notableFinding, Bagosora exercised de facto authority over the Rwandan military after the president’s assassination in April 1994]
-
A.
Minister of Defence of Rwanda
The Minister of Defence of Rwanda is the government official responsible for overseeing the country’s national defense policy, armed forces, and military strategy.
-
B.
President of Rwanda
The President of Rwanda is the head of state and government of Rwanda, responsible for leading the executive branch, shaping national policy, and representing the country in regional and international affairs.
-
C.
Vice President of Rwanda
The Vice President of Rwanda was a former senior governmental role that served as the second-highest executive office in the country’s leadership structure before being abolished in later constitutional reforms.
-
D.
Government of Rwanda
The Government of Rwanda is the central governing authority of the Republic of Rwanda, responsible for national administration, policymaking, and implementation of laws across the country.
-
E.
Mwami of Rwanda
The Mwami of Rwanda was the traditional monarch and supreme ruler of the Kingdom of Rwanda prior to the establishment of the modern republic.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bagosora exercised de facto authority over the Rwandan military after the president’s assassination in April 1994 Target entity description: Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora is a landmark case before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda concerning the criminal responsibility of a senior Rwandan military officer for his role in the 1994 genocide.
-
A.
Minister of Defence of Rwanda
The Minister of Defence of Rwanda is the government official responsible for overseeing the country’s national defense policy, armed forces, and military strategy.
-
B.
President of Rwanda
The President of Rwanda is the head of state and government of Rwanda, responsible for leading the executive branch, shaping national policy, and representing the country in regional and international affairs.
-
C.
Vice President of Rwanda
The Vice President of Rwanda was a former senior governmental role that served as the second-highest executive office in the country’s leadership structure before being abolished in later constitutional reforms.
-
D.
Government of Rwanda
The Government of Rwanda is the central governing authority of the Republic of Rwanda, responsible for national administration, policymaking, and implementation of laws across the country.
-
E.
Mwami of Rwanda
The Mwami of Rwanda was the traditional monarch and supreme ruler of the Kingdom of Rwanda prior to the establishment of the modern republic.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (25)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
ICTR case
ⓘ
international criminal case ⓘ |
| appliedDoctrine |
command responsibility
ⓘ
individual criminal responsibility ⓘ |
| characterizedAs | landmark case of the ICTR ⓘ |
| concernsEvent | 1994 Rwandan genocide ⓘ |
| concernsPerson | Théoneste Bagosora ⓘ |
| finding |
Bagosora exercised de facto authority over the Rwandan military after the president’s assassination in April 1994
ⓘ
Théoneste Bagosora was a key civilian authority in Rwanda during the genocide ⓘ Théoneste Bagosora was responsible for crimes committed by forces under his authority ⓘ
linked to:
Théoneste Bagosora
|
| heardBy | International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
crimes against humanity
ⓘ
criminal responsibility for genocide ⓘ war crimes ⓘ |
| party |
Office of the Prosecutor of the ICTR
ⓘ
linked to:
Office of the Prosecutor (ICTR)
Théoneste Bagosora ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Rwandan Armed Forces
ⓘ
assassination of President Juvénal Habyarimana ⓘ |
| roleOfAccused | senior Rwandan military officer ⓘ |
| significance |
addressed responsibility of senior military leadership for genocide in Rwanda
ⓘ
clarified standards for command responsibility in international criminal law ⓘ |
| subjectMatter | Rwandan genocide leadership responsibility ⓘ |
| timePeriod | 1994 ⓘ |
| tribunalSeat | Arusha, Tanzania ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Bagosora exercised de facto authority over the Rwandan military after the president’s assassination in April 1994 Description of subject: Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora is a landmark case before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda concerning the criminal responsibility of a senior Rwandan military officer for his role in the 1994 genocide.
Referenced by (3)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora
→
notableFinding
→
Bagosora exercised de facto authority over the Rwandan military after the president’s assassination in April 1994
ⓘ
Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora
→
finding
→
Théoneste Bagosora was a key civilian authority in Rwanda during the genocide
ⓘ
subject linked to:
Bagosora exercised de facto authority over the Rwandan military after the president’s assassination in April 1994
linked to: Bagosora exercised de facto authority over the Rwandan military after the president’s assassination in April 1994