Marek v. Chesny
E823909
Marek v. Chesny is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified how settlement offers under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 affect the recovery of attorney’s fees in civil rights litigation.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Marek v. Chesny canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T9829366 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Marek v. Chesny Context triple: [Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976, keyCase, Marek v. Chesny]
-
A.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
B.
United States v. Bajakajian
United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
-
C.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
D.
Marsh v. Chambers
Marsh v. Chambers is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of legislative prayer, finding that opening legislative sessions with a state-funded chaplain’s invocation did not violate the Establishment Clause.
-
E.
Miller v. Johnson
Miller v. Johnson is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the doctrine on racial gerrymandering and the Equal Protection Clause in legislative redistricting.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Marek v. Chesny Target entity description: Marek v. Chesny is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified how settlement offers under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 affect the recovery of attorney’s fees in civil rights litigation.
-
A.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
B.
United States v. Bajakajian
United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
-
C.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
D.
Marsh v. Chambers
Marsh v. Chambers is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of legislative prayer, finding that opening legislative sessions with a state-funded chaplain’s invocation did not violate the Establishment Clause.
-
E.
Miller v. Johnson
Miller v. Johnson is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the doctrine on racial gerrymandering and the Equal Protection Clause in legislative redistricting.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (35)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
legal case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
civil procedure
ⓘ
civil rights law ⓘ |
| arguedDate | 1984-12-03 ⓘ |
| citation | 473 U.S. 1 ⓘ |
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decidedYear | 1985 ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1985-06-27 ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 83-1437 ⓘ |
| effect |
Clarified the interaction between Rule 68 offers of judgment and statutory attorney’s fee provisions in civil rights cases.
ⓘ
Encouraged early settlement in civil rights litigation by limiting post-offer fee recovery when offers are rejected. ⓘ |
| holding |
A plaintiff who rejects a Rule 68 settlement offer and then obtains a judgment less favorable than the offer may not recover post-offer attorney’s fees that are defined as costs.
ⓘ
Attorney’s fees recoverable as part of costs under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 are included within the term “costs” in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68. ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| legalSubject |
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68
ⓘ
attorney’s fees ⓘ civil rights litigation ⓘ offers of judgment ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger
ⓘ
linked to:
Warren E. Burger
Warren E. Burger ⓘ |
| page | 1 ⓘ |
| parties |
Chesny
ⓘ
Marek ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Evans v. Jeff D.
ⓘ
Hensley v. Eckerhart ⓘ |
| relatedConcept |
costs
ⓘ
fee-shifting ⓘ settlement offer ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| ruleInterpreted | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 ⓘ |
| statuteInterpreted | 42 U.S.C. § 1988 ⓘ |
| volume | 473 ⓘ |
| vote | 6-3 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Marek v. Chesny Description of subject: Marek v. Chesny is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified how settlement offers under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 affect the recovery of attorney’s fees in civil rights litigation.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.