sentencing remarks in R v Poumako
E802294
The sentencing remarks in R v Poumako are a significant New Zealand judicial decision by Dame Sian Elias that critically examined the application of retrospective criminal legislation and minimum sentencing provisions.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| sentencing remarks in R v Poumako canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T9493757 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: sentencing remarks in R v Poumako Context triple: [Dame Sian Elias, notableWork, sentencing remarks in R v Poumako]
-
A.
Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000
The Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 is a key UK statute that consolidates and sets out the sentencing powers and procedures available to criminal courts in England and Wales.
-
B.
judgment in R v A (No 2)
The judgment in R v A (No 2) is a leading House of Lords decision on the admissibility of a complainant’s sexual history evidence in rape trials and the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on such evidential rules.
-
C.
Sentencing Advisory Panel
The Sentencing Advisory Panel was a former independent body in England and Wales that provided expert advice and recommendations on sentencing to help ensure consistency and fairness in the criminal justice system.
-
D.
Sentencing Council for England and Wales
The Sentencing Council for England and Wales is an independent body that develops sentencing guidelines and promotes consistency and transparency in criminal sentencing across England and Wales.
-
E.
Criminal Appeal Act 1995
The Criminal Appeal Act 1995 is a UK statute that overhauled the criminal appeals system, most notably creating the Criminal Cases Review Commission to investigate potential miscarriages of justice.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: sentencing remarks in R v Poumako Target entity description: The sentencing remarks in R v Poumako are a significant New Zealand judicial decision by Dame Sian Elias that critically examined the application of retrospective criminal legislation and minimum sentencing provisions.
-
A.
Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000
The Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 is a key UK statute that consolidates and sets out the sentencing powers and procedures available to criminal courts in England and Wales.
-
B.
judgment in R v A (No 2)
The judgment in R v A (No 2) is a leading House of Lords decision on the admissibility of a complainant’s sexual history evidence in rape trials and the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on such evidential rules.
-
C.
Sentencing Advisory Panel
The Sentencing Advisory Panel was a former independent body in England and Wales that provided expert advice and recommendations on sentencing to help ensure consistency and fairness in the criminal justice system.
-
D.
Sentencing Council for England and Wales
The Sentencing Council for England and Wales is an independent body that develops sentencing guidelines and promotes consistency and transparency in criminal sentencing across England and Wales.
-
E.
Criminal Appeal Act 1995
The Criminal Appeal Act 1995 is a UK statute that overhauled the criminal appeals system, most notably creating the Criminal Cases Review Commission to investigate potential miscarriages of justice.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (40)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
judicial decision
ⓘ
legal opinion ⓘ sentencing remarks ⓘ |
| appliesPrinciple |
presumption against retrospectivity
ⓘ
strict construction of penal statutes ⓘ |
| appliesToCase | R v Poumako ⓘ |
| author | Dame Sian Elias ⓘ |
| citationJurisdiction | New Zealand courts ⓘ |
| concernsOffenceType | serious violent offending ⓘ |
| considers |
fairness in sentencing
ⓘ
parliamentary intention behind minimum sentences ⓘ principle against retrospectivity in criminal law ⓘ |
| country | New Zealand ⓘ |
| court | High Court of New Zealand ⓘ |
| criticises | retrospective application of minimum sentencing provisions ⓘ |
| examines |
application of retrospective criminal legislation
ⓘ
operation of minimum sentencing provisions ⓘ |
| judge | Dame Sian Elias ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | New Zealand ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalArea |
criminal law
ⓘ
sentencing law ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
interpretation of sentencing legislation
ⓘ
mandatory minimum sentences ⓘ minimum sentencing provisions ⓘ non‑retroactivity of criminal law ⓘ retrospective criminal legislation ⓘ |
| legalSystem | New Zealand common law ⓘ |
| legalSystemConcept |
rule of law
ⓘ
separation of powers ⓘ |
| partOf | R v Poumako ⓘ |
| presidingJudge | Dame Sian Elias ⓘ |
| relatedToConcept |
human rights in criminal justice
ⓘ
judicial discretion in sentencing ⓘ |
| relatedToStatute | New Zealand sentencing legislation ⓘ |
| significance |
important New Zealand authority on retrospective criminal legislation
ⓘ
influential in debates on minimum sentencing in New Zealand ⓘ |
| typeOfDecision | sentencing decision ⓘ |
| usedAsPrecedentFor |
interpretation of retrospective sentencing provisions
ⓘ
limits on retrospective criminal punishment ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: sentencing remarks in R v Poumako Description of subject: The sentencing remarks in R v Poumako are a significant New Zealand judicial decision by Dame Sian Elias that critically examined the application of retrospective criminal legislation and minimum sentencing provisions.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.