Mark Janus

E755432

Mark Janus is an Illinois state employee who became the central figure in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case challenging mandatory public-sector union fees on First Amendment grounds.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Mark Janus canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (33)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Illinois state employee ⓘ
person ⓘ
plaintiff ⓘ
caseOutcome U.S. Supreme Court ruled in his favor ⓘ
countryOfCitizenship United States of America ⓘ
describedAs central figure in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case on public‑sector union fees ⓘ
employer Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services ⓘ
fieldOfLegalImpact constitutional law ⓘ
labor law ⓘ
public‑sector labor relations ⓘ
legalAction challenged mandatory public‑sector union agency fees ⓘ
legalArgumentBasedOn First Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
legalIssue compelled subsidization of union speech ⓘ
constitutionality of agency shop arrangements in the public sector ⓘ
legalStandingAs non‑member of AFSCME ⓘ
mediaCoverage extensive national media attention in the United States ⓘ
notableCourtDecisionDate 2018-06-27 ⓘ
notableFor being the named plaintiff in Janus v. AFSCME ⓘ
occupation child support specialist ⓘ
opposedOrganization American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 ⓘ
linked to: AFSCME Council 31
opposedPractice collection of agency fees from non‑union public employees ⓘ
partyTo Janus v. AFSCME ⓘ
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 ⓘ
linked to: Janus v. AFSCME
positionOnUnionFees opposed mandatory agency fees for non‑member public employees ⓘ
predecessorCase Abood v. Detroit Board of Education ⓘ
religionOrPoliticalView supports right‑to‑work principles ⓘ
representedBy Liberty Justice Center ⓘ
National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation ⓘ
resultedIn public‑sector unions barred from collecting mandatory agency fees from non‑consenting employees ⓘ
strengthening of First Amendment protections for public employees regarding compelled speech ⓘ
soughtOutcome overturn Abood v. Detroit Board of Education ⓘ
stateOfResidence Illinois ⓘ
workLocation Springfield, Illinois ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Janus v. AFSCME → petitioner → Mark Janus ⓘ