Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus

E725378

"Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus" is a scholarly work by philosopher and theologian William Lane Craig that rigorously examines biblical and historical data to argue for the historical credibility of Jesus’ resurrection.

All labels observed (1)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (43)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Christian apologetics work ⓘ
philosophical work ⓘ
scholarly work ⓘ
theological work ⓘ
addresses criteria for historicity in New Testament scholarship ⓘ
historical reliability of the Gospels ⓘ
objections to the historicity of the resurrection ⓘ
aim to argue for the historical credibility of Jesus’ resurrection ⓘ
argumentType cumulative case argument for the resurrection ⓘ
author William Lane Craig ⓘ
contributesTo debate on the historical Jesus ⓘ
debate on the resurrection in contemporary theology ⓘ
examines Gospel passion and resurrection narratives ⓘ
Pauline resurrection traditions ⓘ
early Christian proclamation of the resurrection ⓘ
field Christian theology ⓘ
New Testament studies ⓘ
philosophy of religion ⓘ
focusesOn New Testament resurrection narratives ⓘ
biblical data concerning the resurrection ⓘ
empty tomb traditions ⓘ
historical data concerning the resurrection ⓘ
post-resurrection appearances of Jesus ⓘ
genre academic monograph ⓘ
intendedAudience Christian apologists ⓘ
philosophers of religion ⓘ
scholars ⓘ
theologians ⓘ
language English ⓘ
mainTopic New Testament evidence ⓘ
historicity of the resurrection ⓘ
resurrection of Jesus ⓘ
methodology historical-critical analysis of New Testament texts ⓘ
philosophical argumentation ⓘ
positionOnSources treats New Testament documents as historical sources to be critically evaluated ⓘ
relatedWorkByAuthor Reasonable Faith ⓘ
The Son Rises: The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus ⓘ
religiousPerspective Christian ⓘ
religiousTraditionContext Evangelical Christianity ⓘ
linked to: Evangelicalism
scholarlyApproach engagement with New Testament scholarship ⓘ
use of historical criteria such as multiple attestation and embarrassment ⓘ
supportsPosition the resurrection of Jesus is a historically credible event ⓘ
typeOfArgument historical apologetic for Christianity ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

William Lane Craig → hasWritten → Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus ⓘ