WG 23 addresses programming language vulnerabilities
E697049
WG 23 addresses programming language vulnerabilities is an ISO/IEC working group focused on identifying, analyzing, and providing guidance to mitigate security vulnerabilities in programming languages and their use.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| WG 23 addresses programming language vulnerabilities canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T7920921 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: WG 23 addresses programming language vulnerabilities Context triple: [ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22, workingGroupScope, WG 23 addresses programming language vulnerabilities]
-
A.
"Guardians and Actions: Linguistic Support for Robust, Distributed Programs"
"Guardians and Actions: Linguistic Support for Robust, Distributed Programs" is a foundational research paper that introduces language constructs for building fault-tolerant, distributed systems, notably influencing the design of the Argus programming language.
-
B.
CWE
CWE is the IATA airport code assigned to Cairo West Air Base, a military airfield serving the Cairo region in Egypt.
-
C.
The Next 700 Programming Languages
"The Next 700 Programming Languages" is a seminal 1966 paper by Peter J. Landin that introduced key concepts in the theory and design of programming languages, including the ISWIM language and the use of lambda calculus as a foundation for language semantics.
-
D.
Programming Language Design and Implementation
Programming Language Design and Implementation is a premier annual academic conference focusing on research in programming languages and compilers, sponsored by ACM SIGPLAN.
-
E.
Types and Programming Languages (research contributions)
Types and Programming Languages (research contributions) refers to Tobias Nipkow’s influential work advancing the theory and mechanization of type systems and programming language semantics, particularly through formal verification and theorem proving.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: WG 23 addresses programming language vulnerabilities Target entity description: WG 23 addresses programming language vulnerabilities is an ISO/IEC working group focused on identifying, analyzing, and providing guidance to mitigate security vulnerabilities in programming languages and their use.
-
A.
"Guardians and Actions: Linguistic Support for Robust, Distributed Programs"
"Guardians and Actions: Linguistic Support for Robust, Distributed Programs" is a foundational research paper that introduces language constructs for building fault-tolerant, distributed systems, notably influencing the design of the Argus programming language.
-
B.
CWE
CWE is the IATA airport code assigned to Cairo West Air Base, a military airfield serving the Cairo region in Egypt.
-
C.
The Next 700 Programming Languages
"The Next 700 Programming Languages" is a seminal 1966 paper by Peter J. Landin that introduced key concepts in the theory and design of programming languages, including the ISWIM language and the use of lambda calculus as a foundation for language semantics.
-
D.
Programming Language Design and Implementation
Programming Language Design and Implementation is a premier annual academic conference focusing on research in programming languages and compilers, sponsored by ACM SIGPLAN.
-
E.
Types and Programming Languages (research contributions)
Types and Programming Languages (research contributions) refers to Tobias Nipkow’s influential work advancing the theory and mechanization of type systems and programming language semantics, particularly through formal verification and theorem proving.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
ISO/IEC working group
ⓘ
standards working group ⓘ |
| activity |
develops international standards
ⓘ
produces guidance documents ⓘ produces technical reports ⓘ |
| collaboratesWith |
academic researchers
ⓘ
industry experts ⓘ national standards bodies ⓘ |
| field |
cybersecurity
ⓘ
programming languages ⓘ software engineering ⓘ software security ⓘ |
| focus |
mitigation of security vulnerabilities in software
ⓘ
programming language vulnerabilities ⓘ secure use of programming languages ⓘ |
| geographicScope | international ⓘ |
| goal |
improve safety and security of software written in standardized languages
ⓘ
reduce security risks in software systems ⓘ |
| governedBy |
ISO/IEC directives
ⓘ
linked to:
ISO/IEC Directives
|
| name | WG 23 addresses programming language vulnerabilities ⓘ |
| output |
catalogs of common programming language vulnerabilities
ⓘ
guidance for safer use of programming languages ⓘ recommendations for language standardization groups ⓘ |
| parentCommittee | ISO/IEC JTC 1 ⓘ |
| parentOrganization |
International Electrotechnical Commission
ⓘ
International Organization for Standardization ⓘ |
| purpose |
analyze programming language vulnerabilities
ⓘ
identify security vulnerabilities related to programming languages ⓘ provide guidance to mitigate programming language vulnerabilities ⓘ support development of secure software ⓘ |
| scope |
vulnerabilities arising from programming language design
ⓘ
vulnerabilities arising from programming language implementation ⓘ vulnerabilities arising from programming language usage ⓘ |
| shortName | WG 23 ⓘ |
| stakeholder |
compiler and tool implementers
ⓘ
programming language designers ⓘ security practitioners ⓘ software developers ⓘ |
| standardizationDomain |
information technology
ⓘ
software and systems engineering ⓘ |
| topic |
guidance for language standard committees
ⓘ
language-level security controls ⓘ risk assessment of language features ⓘ secure coding practices ⓘ vulnerability classification in programming languages ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: WG 23 addresses programming language vulnerabilities Description of subject: WG 23 addresses programming language vulnerabilities is an ISO/IEC working group focused on identifying, analyzing, and providing guidance to mitigate security vulnerabilities in programming languages and their use.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.