Brutus XVII

E408175

Brutus XVII is one of the later essays in the Anti-Federalist "Brutus" series, in which the author critiques the proposed U.S. Constitution’s judiciary and warns of the dangers of an overly powerful federal court system.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Brutus XVII canonical 2

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (44)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Anti-Federalist essay ⓘ
pamphlet ⓘ
political essay ⓘ
argues broad constitutional clauses enable judicial expansion of power ⓘ
federal courts will tend to enlarge their own jurisdiction ⓘ
judges with life tenure will be insufficiently accountable ⓘ
state courts will be subordinated to federal courts ⓘ
the Supreme Court will be the final arbiter of the Constitution’s meaning ⓘ
concerns danger of judicial supremacy ⓘ
lack of effective checks on the federal judiciary ⓘ
countryOfOrigin United States ⓘ
critiques Supreme Court’s potential power ⓘ
proposed federal court system ⓘ
genre political commentary ⓘ
hasAuthor Brutus (pseudonymous Anti-Federalist writer) ⓘ
hasLanguage English ⓘ
hasPerspective Anti-Federalist ⓘ
hasSubject United States Constitution ⓘ
constitutional interpretation ⓘ
federal judiciary ⓘ
federalism ⓘ
judicial power ⓘ
judicial review ⓘ
separation of powers ⓘ
states’ rights ⓘ
supremacy of federal law ⓘ
historicalContext debates over ratification of the U.S. Constitution ⓘ
influenced later discussions of judicial power in the United States ⓘ
opposes strongly centralized national judiciary ⓘ
partOf Anti-Federalist Papers ⓘ
Brutus essays ⓘ
linked to: Letters of Brutus
politicalAlignment states’ rights orientation ⓘ
primaryConcern protection of liberty against judicial overreach ⓘ
publicationPeriod 1787–1788 ⓘ
relatedTo Anti-Federalist critiques of judicial review ⓘ
Article III of the United States Constitution ⓘ
Federalist Papers ⓘ
supports a more limited federal judiciary ⓘ
retention of significant judicial authority by the states ⓘ
warnsAbout consolidation of power in the national government ⓘ
erosion of state sovereignty ⓘ
judges interpreting the Constitution according to their own will ⓘ
judicial encroachment on legislative power ⓘ
overly powerful federal judiciary ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.