Windsor

E393170

Windsor is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a key part of the Defense of Marriage Act, advancing federal recognition of same-sex marriages.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Windsor canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf LGBT rights case ⓘ
U.S. Supreme Court case ⓘ
civil rights case ⓘ
constitutional law case ⓘ
landmark case ⓘ
areaOfLaw LGBT rights in the United States ⓘ
family law ⓘ
federalism ⓘ
argumentDate 2013-03-27 ⓘ
challengedProvision Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act ⓘ
challengedStatute Defense of Marriage Act ⓘ
citation 133 S. Ct. 2675 ⓘ
186 L. Ed. 2d 808 ⓘ
570 U.S. 744 ⓘ
constitutionalProvision Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
country United States of America ⓘ
decisionDate 2013-06-26 ⓘ
decisionType 5–4 decision ⓘ
defendant United States of America ⓘ
dissentingJustice Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ
Samuel A. Alito Jr. ⓘ
docketNumber 12-307 ⓘ
effect extended federal benefits to married same-sex couples ⓘ
required federal government to recognize same-sex marriages valid under state law ⓘ
struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act ⓘ
hasJurisdiction Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
holding Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons protected by the Fifth Amendment ⓘ
joinedMajorityJustice Elena Kagan ⓘ
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
Sonia Sotomayor ⓘ
Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ
legalIssue due process under the Fifth Amendment ⓘ
equal protection under the Fifth Amendment ⓘ
federal recognition of same-sex marriages ⓘ
locationOfLowerCourtCase United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ⓘ
lowerCourt United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ⓘ
lowerCourtOutcome DOMA Section 3 held unconstitutional ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ
petitioner United States ⓘ
plaintiff Edith Windsor ⓘ
precedentFor Obergefell v. Hodges ⓘ
relatedCase Hollingsworth v. Perry ⓘ
relatedLegislation Defense of Marriage Act ⓘ
respondent Edith Windsor ⓘ
result federal definition of marriage could not exclude same-sex couples where states recognized such marriages ⓘ
subjectMatter estate tax refund for surviving same-sex spouse ⓘ
term October Term 2012 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.