Nixon v. Condon
E362096
Nixon v. Condon is a 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas’s delegation of authority to the Democratic Party to exclude Black voters from primary elections as unconstitutional state action under the Fourteenth Amendment.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Nixon v. Condon canonical | 2 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T3488621 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nixon v. Condon Context triple: [Grovey v. Townsend, relatedCase, Nixon v. Condon]
-
A.
Nixon v. Fitzgerald
Nixon v. Fitzgerald is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that established absolute immunity from civil damages liability for a President’s official acts.
-
B.
Katzenbach v. Morgan
Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
-
C.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
D.
Betts v. Brady
Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
-
E.
United States v. Nixon
United States v. Nixon was a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential privilege and compelled President Richard Nixon to release the Watergate tapes, reinforcing the principle that not even the president is above the law.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nixon v. Condon Target entity description: Nixon v. Condon is a 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas’s delegation of authority to the Democratic Party to exclude Black voters from primary elections as unconstitutional state action under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
A.
Nixon v. Fitzgerald
Nixon v. Fitzgerald is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that established absolute immunity from civil damages liability for a President’s official acts.
-
B.
Katzenbach v. Morgan
Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
-
C.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
D.
Betts v. Brady
Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
-
E.
United States v. Nixon
United States v. Nixon was a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential privilege and compelled President Richard Nixon to release the Watergate tapes, reinforcing the principle that not even the president is above the law.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (42)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Fourteenth Amendment case
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ civil rights case ⓘ voting rights case ⓘ |
| appliesTo | state primary elections conducted under statutory authority ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
civil rights law
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ election law ⓘ |
| citation | 286 U.S. 73 ⓘ |
| clarifiedDoctrine | scope of state action in relation to political parties ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInvolved |
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
ⓘ
linked to:
Fourteenth Amendment
|
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| decisionDate | 1932 ⓘ |
| defendant | C. C. Condon ⓘ |
| effect |
advanced legal challenges to white primary systems in the American South
ⓘ
limited the ability of states to use political parties to circumvent the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| foundUnconstitutional | Texas statutory scheme delegating to party executive committees the power to determine voter qualifications for primaries ⓘ |
| governmentalActionChallenged | Texas law delegating to party executive committees the power to set primary voter qualifications ⓘ |
| hasJurisdiction | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| historicalSignificance | contributed to the dismantling of legally sanctioned white primaries in the United States ⓘ |
| holding |
Texas’s delegation of authority to the Democratic Party to exclude Black voters from primary elections constituted unconstitutional state action
ⓘ
the exclusion of Black voters from Texas Democratic primaries under delegated statutory authority violated the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| languageOfProceedings | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
African American voting rights
ⓘ
racial discrimination in primary elections ⓘ state action ⓘ |
| levelOfCourt | federal court of last resort ⓘ |
| locationOfOriginatingDispute | Texas ⓘ |
| partyToCase |
C. C. Condon
ⓘ
Dr. L. A. Nixon ⓘ other members of the Texas Democratic Party executive committee ⓘ |
| plaintiff | Dr. L. A. Nixon ⓘ |
| precedentFor | later Supreme Court decisions invalidating white primaries ⓘ |
| raceDiscriminationContext | exclusion of Black voters from Democratic Party primaries in Texas ⓘ |
| recognizedAs | important early Supreme Court limitation on white primary practices ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Grovey v. Townsend
ⓘ
Nixon v. Herndon ⓘ Smith v. Allwright ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
Democratic Party primary elections in Texas
ⓘ
white primary system in Texas ⓘ |
| timePeriod |
Jim Crow era
ⓘ
linked to:
Jim Crow laws
|
| typeOfDiscrimination | racial discrimination in voting ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Nixon v. Condon Description of subject: Nixon v. Condon is a 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas’s delegation of authority to the Democratic Party to exclude Black voters from primary elections as unconstitutional state action under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.