Engblom v. Carey
E305566
Engblom v. Carey is a 1982 U.S. Court of Appeals case that clarified the scope of the Third Amendment by holding that state National Guard troops could be considered "soldiers" and that tenants, not just owners, may be protected against their quartering.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Engblom v. Carey canonical | 2 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T2861576 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Engblom v. Carey Context triple: [Third Amendment to the United States Constitution, notableCase, Engblom v. Carey]
-
A.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
B.
Corrigan v. Buckley
Corrigan v. Buckley is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in property deeds, paving the way for widespread legalized housing segregation until later overturned in effect by subsequent civil rights rulings.
-
C.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
D.
Milliken v. Bradley
Milliken v. Bradley is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of school desegregation remedies by ruling that courts could not impose cross-district busing plans absent proof of interdistrict segregation.
-
E.
Romer v. Evans
Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Engblom v. Carey Target entity description: Engblom v. Carey is a 1982 U.S. Court of Appeals case that clarified the scope of the Third Amendment by holding that state National Guard troops could be considered "soldiers" and that tenants, not just owners, may be protected against their quartering.
-
A.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
B.
Corrigan v. Buckley
Corrigan v. Buckley is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in property deeds, paving the way for widespread legalized housing segregation until later overturned in effect by subsequent civil rights rulings.
-
C.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
D.
Milliken v. Bradley
Milliken v. Bradley is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of school desegregation remedies by ruling that courts could not impose cross-district busing plans absent proof of interdistrict segregation.
-
E.
Romer v. Evans
Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (40)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Third Amendment case
ⓘ
U.S. Court of Appeals case ⓘ United States federal court case ⓘ |
| amendmentNumber | Third Amendment ⓘ |
| appliedDoctrine |
incorporation through the Fourteenth Amendment
ⓘ
property-based expectations of privacy and control ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
civil rights
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ |
| circuit | Second Circuit ⓘ |
| citation | 677 F.2d 957 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted | Third Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ |
| constitutionalRightRecognized | right of certain tenants to be free from quartering of soldiers in peacetime without consent ⓘ |
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1982 ⓘ |
| defendantOffice | Governor of New York ⓘ |
| factualBackground |
correction officers were evicted from their residences during a strike
ⓘ
state National Guard troops were quartered in correction officers’ residences ⓘ |
| heldThat |
members of a state National Guard can be considered soldiers for purposes of the Third Amendment
ⓘ
property-based interests such as tenancy can create a protected Third Amendment interest ⓘ tenants may have Third Amendment protections against quartering of soldiers ⓘ the Third Amendment applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| holdingScope |
Third Amendment protections are not limited to homeowners
ⓘ
Third Amendment protections can extend to lawful occupants with a significant property interest ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States federal courts
ⓘ
linked to:
U.S. federal courts
|
| legalIssue |
scope of the Third Amendment
ⓘ
whether National Guard troops are soldiers under the Third Amendment ⓘ whether tenants are protected against quartering under the Third Amendment ⓘ |
| parties |
Charles Palmer
ⓘ
Hugh L. Carey ⓘ Marianne Engblom ⓘ |
| plaintiffStatus | New York state correction officers ⓘ |
| precedentialStatus | binding precedent within the Second Circuit on Third Amendment issues ⓘ |
| quarteringContext | use of employee housing for National Guard troops during a labor dispute ⓘ |
| result | case remanded for further proceedings consistent with the appellate opinion ⓘ |
| significance |
clarified that the Third Amendment can be incorporated against the states
ⓘ
expanded understanding of who may be protected from quartering of soldiers ⓘ one of the few modern federal appellate decisions interpreting the Third Amendment ⓘ |
| stateInvolved | New York ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1982 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Engblom v. Carey Description of subject: Engblom v. Carey is a 1982 U.S. Court of Appeals case that clarified the scope of the Third Amendment by holding that state National Guard troops could be considered "soldiers" and that tenants, not just owners, may be protected against their quartering.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.