Farrer hypothesis

E263233

The Farrer hypothesis is a theory of New Testament source criticism that proposes the Gospel of Mark was written first, Matthew used Mark, and Luke used both Mark and Matthew, thereby dispensing with the need for a separate Q source.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Farrer hypothesis canonical 13

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf hypothesis ⓘ
theory of New Testament source criticism ⓘ
addresses literary relationships among the synoptic gospels ⓘ
alternativeTo Q hypothesis ⓘ
Two-source hypothesis ⓘ
appliesTo Gospel of Luke ⓘ
Gospel of Mark ⓘ
Gospel of Matthew ⓘ
assumes Markan priority ⓘ
classification no-Q solution to the synoptic problem ⓘ
concerns the synoptic problem ⓘ
contrastsWith Griesbach hypothesis ⓘ
three-source hypothesis ⓘ
coreClaim Luke knew and used Matthew directly ⓘ
no need to posit a lost written sayings source ⓘ
critiques multiplication of hypothetical sources in synoptic theories ⓘ
denies the necessity of a hypothetical Q source ⓘ
developedBy Austin Farrer ⓘ
field New Testament studies ⓘ
biblical studies ⓘ
source criticism ⓘ
hasPerspectiveOn order of composition of the synoptic gospels ⓘ
inAcademicDiscipline religious studies ⓘ
theology ⓘ
influencedBy Austin Farrer ⓘ
involves analysis of double tradition material ⓘ
analysis of narrative order in synoptic gospels ⓘ
analysis of verbal agreements between synoptic gospels ⓘ
language English ⓘ
methodologicalStance prefers fewer hypothetical documents ⓘ
namedAfter Austin Farrer ⓘ
proposes the Gospel of Luke used the Gospel of Mark as a source ⓘ
the Gospel of Luke used the Gospel of Matthew as a source ⓘ
the Gospel of Mark was written first ⓘ
the Gospel of Matthew used the Gospel of Mark as a source ⓘ
rejects the existence of a lost sayings source Q ⓘ
relatedConcept literary dependence among gospels ⓘ
redaction criticism ⓘ
synoptic tradition ⓘ
status minority position in New Testament scholarship ⓘ
subjectOf debate in contemporary New Testament scholarship ⓘ
supportedBy Mark Goodacre ⓘ
Michael Goulder ⓘ
other Q-skeptical scholars ⓘ
timePeriod 20th century formulation ⓘ
uses Markan priority ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (13)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Q source (hypothetical) → alternativeTo → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Synoptic Problem → hasKeyConcept → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Q source hypothesis → contrastedWith → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Quelle → alternativeTo → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Augustinian hypothesis → contrastsWith → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Griesbach hypothesis → alternativeTo → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Markan priority → hasOpponents → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Augustinian hypothesis → competesWith → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Matthean priority → relatedTo → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Mark Goodacre → theoryAdvocated → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Lukan priority hypothesis → contradicts → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Four-source hypothesis → contrastsWith → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ
Michael Goulder → supportedTheory → Farrer hypothesis ⓘ