The Confrontation Clause requires that the prosecution present the testimony of the analyst who certified a forensic laboratory report unless that analyst is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity for cross-examination.

E1993364 UNEXPLORED

This entity is a constitutional rule, articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Bullcoming v. New Mexico, that strengthens a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment confrontation rights in cases involving forensic laboratory reports.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label	Occurrences
The Confrontation Clause requires that the prosecution present the testimony of the analyst who certified a forensic laboratory report unless that analyst is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity for cross-examination. canonical	1

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Bullcoming v. New Mexico → holding → The Confrontation Clause requires that the prosecution present the testimony of the analyst who certified a forensic laboratory report unless that analyst is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity for cross-examination. ⓘ