Warrant: The Current Debate

Target entity: Warrant: The Current Debate
Context triple: [Alvin Plantinga, notableWork, Warrant: The Current Debate]

• A. In Our Defense: The Bill of Rights in Action
  In Our Defense: The Bill of Rights in Action is a nonfiction book that uses real-life court cases and stories to explain and illustrate the meaning and impact of the U.S. Bill of Rights.
• B. Illinois v. Gates
  Illinois v. Gates is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the "totality of the circumstances" test for determining whether an informant’s tip provides probable cause for issuing a search warrant.
• C. Frontiers of Justice
  Frontiers of Justice is a philosophical work by Martha Nussbaum that extends theories of justice to address the rights and moral standing of people with disabilities, non-human animals, and citizens of other nations.
• D. Windsor v. United States (in part)
  Windsor v. United States (in part) is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down key portions of the Defense of Marriage Act, advancing federal recognition of same-sex marriages.
• E. The Man Versus the State
  The Man Versus the State is a political philosophy book by Herbert Spencer that critiques government intervention and defends individual liberty and limited state power.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Warrant: The Current Debate
Target entity description: "Warrant: The Current Debate" is a major philosophical work by Alvin Plantinga that critically surveys contemporary theories of epistemic justification and sets the stage for his own account of warrant.

• A. In Our Defense: The Bill of Rights in Action
  In Our Defense: The Bill of Rights in Action is a nonfiction book that uses real-life court cases and stories to explain and illustrate the meaning and impact of the U.S. Bill of Rights.
• B. Illinois v. Gates
  Illinois v. Gates is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the "totality of the circumstances" test for determining whether an informant’s tip provides probable cause for issuing a search warrant.
• C. Frontiers of Justice
  Frontiers of Justice is a philosophical work by Martha Nussbaum that extends theories of justice to address the rights and moral standing of people with disabilities, non-human animals, and citizens of other nations.
• D. Windsor v. United States (in part)
  Windsor v. United States (in part) is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down key portions of the Defense of Marriage Act, advancing federal recognition of same-sex marriages.
• E. The Man Versus the State
  The Man Versus the State is a political philosophy book by Herbert Spencer that critiques government intervention and defends individual liberty and limited state power.
• F. None of above. chosen