Daniel Donnelly et al.

E191391

Daniel Donnelly et al. refers to the group of respondents, led by Daniel Donnelly, who were parties challenging a municipal holiday display in the U.S. Supreme Court case Lynch v. Donnelly.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Daniel Donnelly et al. canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (30)

Predicate Object
instanceOf group of litigants ⓘ
party to a lawsuit ⓘ
respondents in a United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
associatedCity Pawtucket, Rhode Island ⓘ
linked to: Pawtucket
caseCitation Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668 (1984) ⓘ
linked to: Lynch v. Donnelly
caseHeardBy Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ⓘ
United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island ⓘ
caseType Establishment Clause challenge to government religious display ⓘ
challenged inclusion of a nativity scene (creche) in a city-sponsored Christmas display ⓘ
municipal holiday display in Pawtucket, Rhode Island ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInvoked Establishment Clause ⓘ
country United States of America ⓘ
jurisdiction State of Rhode Island ⓘ
linked to: Rhode Island

United States ⓘ
leadRespondent Daniel Donnelly ⓘ
legalClaim alleged violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ⓘ
legalRole respondents ⓘ
legalSystem common law ⓘ
opposedParty Edward J. Lynch, Mayor of Pawtucket, et al. ⓘ
partyInCase Lynch v. Donnelly ⓘ
positionInSupremeCourt argued that the city’s creche display violated the Establishment Clause ⓘ
representedBy American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Rhode Island ⓘ
roleInPrecedent helped define constitutional limits on government-sponsored religious holiday displays ⓘ
soughtRelief declaratory judgment ⓘ
injunctive relief ⓘ
standingBasis taxpayer and resident status in Pawtucket ⓘ
SupremeCourtOutcomeForGroup lost on the merits in the Supreme Court ⓘ
SupremeCourtVote 5-4 against their Establishment Clause claim ⓘ
timePeriodOfLitigation early 1980s ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Lynch v. Donnelly → hasRespondent → Daniel Donnelly et al. ⓘ