Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View
E167743
"Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View" is a book by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that explores how the Court functions within American democracy and argues for a pragmatic, cooperative approach to constitutional interpretation.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View canonical | 3 |
| Making Our Democracy Work | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1465823 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View Context triple: [Stephen G. Breyer, notableWork, Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View]
-
A.
The Nature of the Judicial Process
The Nature of the Judicial Process is a classic 1921 legal treatise in which Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo analyzes how judges actually decide cases, exploring the interplay of precedent, logic, and social policy in judicial decision-making.
-
B.
Field Notes on Democracy
Field Notes on Democracy is a collection of political essays by Arundhati Roy that critiques contemporary Indian democracy, nationalism, and state power.
-
C.
Democracy and Its Critics
Democracy and Its Critics is a major work of political theory by Robert A. Dahl that systematically examines, defends, and refines the principles and practice of modern democracy against its main philosophical challenges.
-
D.
How Democratic Is the American Constitution?
"How Democratic Is the American Constitution?" is a scholarly book by political scientist Robert A. Dahl that critically examines the undemocratic features and historical compromises embedded in the U.S. Constitution.
-
E.
Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City
"Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City" is a landmark political science study that analyzes the distribution of power and democratic decision-making in New Haven, Connecticut.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View Target entity description: "Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View" is a book by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that explores how the Court functions within American democracy and argues for a pragmatic, cooperative approach to constitutional interpretation.
-
A.
The Nature of the Judicial Process
The Nature of the Judicial Process is a classic 1921 legal treatise in which Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo analyzes how judges actually decide cases, exploring the interplay of precedent, logic, and social policy in judicial decision-making.
-
B.
Field Notes on Democracy
Field Notes on Democracy is a collection of political essays by Arundhati Roy that critiques contemporary Indian democracy, nationalism, and state power.
-
C.
Democracy and Its Critics
Democracy and Its Critics is a major work of political theory by Robert A. Dahl that systematically examines, defends, and refines the principles and practice of modern democracy against its main philosophical challenges.
-
D.
How Democratic Is the American Constitution?
"How Democratic Is the American Constitution?" is a scholarly book by political scientist Robert A. Dahl that critically examines the undemocratic features and historical compromises embedded in the U.S. Constitution.
-
E.
Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City
"Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City" is a landmark political science study that analyzes the distribution of power and democratic decision-making in New Haven, Connecticut.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (41)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
book
ⓘ
non-fiction book ⓘ |
| advocates |
consideration of practical consequences in judicial decisions
ⓘ
institutional cooperation among branches of government ⓘ respect for precedent ⓘ |
| aimsTo |
argue for public acceptance and legitimacy of judicial decisions
ⓘ
explain how the Supreme Court functions within American democracy ⓘ |
| author |
Stephen Breyer
ⓘ
linked to:
Stephen G. Breyer
|
| countryOfOrigin |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| discusses |
Court’s role in protecting minority rights
ⓘ
interpretation of the U.S. Constitution over time ⓘ judicial review ⓘ landmark Supreme Court cases ⓘ relationship between the Court and the elected branches ⓘ |
| genre |
constitutional law
ⓘ
legal literature ⓘ political non-fiction ⓘ |
| hasAuthorOccupation | Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| hasPerspective |
cooperative relationship between branches of government
ⓘ
pragmatic approach to constitutional interpretation ⓘ |
| intendedEffect |
enhance legitimacy of judicial institutions in a democracy
ⓘ
strengthen public understanding of the Supreme Court ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| mainSubject |
American democracy
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court ⓘ
linked to:
Supreme Court of the United States
constitutional interpretation ⓘ judicial philosophy ⓘ rule of law ⓘ separation of powers ⓘ |
| mediaType |
hardcover
ⓘ
paperback ⓘ print ⓘ |
| publicationDate | 2010 ⓘ |
| publisher | Alfred A. Knopf ⓘ |
| relatedWork | Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution ⓘ |
| setting | United States constitutional system ⓘ |
| targetAudience |
general readers
ⓘ
legal professionals ⓘ students of law and political science ⓘ |
| timePeriodDiscussed |
history of the United States Supreme Court
ⓘ
modern era of the Supreme Court ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View Description of subject: "Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View" is a book by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that explores how the Court functions within American democracy and argues for a pragmatic, cooperative approach to constitutional interpretation.
Referenced by (4)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
subject linked to:
Breyer
Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution
→
relatedWorkAuthor
→
Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View
ⓘ
subject linked to:
Stephen
linked to: Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View