Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania

Target entity: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania
Context triple: [Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, notableCase, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania]

• A. Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
  Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
• B. Eisenstadt v. Baird
  Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
• C. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
  Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
• D. Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
  Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
• E. Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
  Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania
Target entity description: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which a Catholic religious order challenged federal contraceptive coverage mandates on religious liberty grounds.

• A. Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
  Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
• B. Eisenstadt v. Baird
  Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
• C. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
  Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
• D. Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
  Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
• E. Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
  Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
• F. None of above. chosen