Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey
E1521126
UNEXPLORED
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to state prisons and inmates.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T22137132 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey Context triple: [United States disability rights law, includesCaseLaw, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey]
-
A.
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
Murdock v. Pennsylvania is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that held it unconstitutional to impose a license tax on the distribution of religious literature, reinforcing First Amendment protections for religious proselytizing.
-
B.
Pennsylvania v. Mimms
Pennsylvania v. Mimms is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that held police officers may order a lawfully stopped driver out of their vehicle without violating the Fourth Amendment.
-
C.
County of Allegheny v. ACLU
County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
-
D.
Maryland v. Wirtz
Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
-
E.
Strickland v. Washington
Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey Target entity description: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to state prisons and inmates.
-
A.
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
Murdock v. Pennsylvania is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that held it unconstitutional to impose a license tax on the distribution of religious literature, reinforcing First Amendment protections for religious proselytizing.
-
B.
Pennsylvania v. Mimms
Pennsylvania v. Mimms is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that held police officers may order a lawfully stopped driver out of their vehicle without violating the Fourth Amendment.
-
C.
County of Allegheny v. ACLU
County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
-
D.
Maryland v. Wirtz
Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
-
E.
Strickland v. Washington
Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
United States disability rights law
→
includesCaseLaw
→
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey
ⓘ