Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology
E1478022
UNEXPLORED
"Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology" is a scholarly monograph by linguist David Embick that examines how morphological and phonological processes interact within theoretical models of grammar, contrasting locality-based and more global approaches.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T21321476 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology Context triple: [David Embick, notableWork, Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology]
-
A.
“Lexical Phonology and Morphology”
“Lexical Phonology and Morphology” is a foundational linguistic work by Paul Kiparsky that develops a theory integrating phonological rules with morphological structure in a stratified lexicon.
-
B.
Distributed Morphology
Distributed Morphology is a theoretical framework in generative linguistics that posits that morphological structure is built in the syntax, integrating word formation with syntactic and phonological processes.
-
C.
Aspects of Phonological Theory
Aspects of Phonological Theory is a seminal work in generative linguistics that helped shape modern phonological theory within the Chomskyan framework.
-
D.
“The geometry of phonological features”
“The geometry of phonological features” is a seminal linguistic work by George N. Clements that proposes a hierarchical, feature-geometric model for representing phonological features in segmental structure.
-
E.
“How Abstract is Phonology?”
“How Abstract is Phonology?” is a seminal linguistic paper by Paul Kiparsky that critically examines the level of abstractness appropriate in phonological representations within generative phonology.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology Target entity description: "Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology" is a scholarly monograph by linguist David Embick that examines how morphological and phonological processes interact within theoretical models of grammar, contrasting locality-based and more global approaches.
-
A.
“Lexical Phonology and Morphology”
“Lexical Phonology and Morphology” is a foundational linguistic work by Paul Kiparsky that develops a theory integrating phonological rules with morphological structure in a stratified lexicon.
-
B.
Distributed Morphology
Distributed Morphology is a theoretical framework in generative linguistics that posits that morphological structure is built in the syntax, integrating word formation with syntactic and phonological processes.
-
C.
Aspects of Phonological Theory
Aspects of Phonological Theory is a seminal work in generative linguistics that helped shape modern phonological theory within the Chomskyan framework.
-
D.
“The geometry of phonological features”
“The geometry of phonological features” is a seminal linguistic work by George N. Clements that proposes a hierarchical, feature-geometric model for representing phonological features in segmental structure.
-
E.
“How Abstract is Phonology?”
“How Abstract is Phonology?” is a seminal linguistic paper by Paul Kiparsky that critically examines the level of abstractness appropriate in phonological representations within generative phonology.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.