Eunomianism

E145796

Eunomianism was a 4th-century Christian theological movement associated with Arianism that taught the Son was of a different substance from the Father and claimed God’s essence could be fully known and defined.

All labels observed (4)

Label Occurrences
Eunomianism canonical 7
Anomoeanism 2
Aetian and Eunomian Anomoeanism 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf 4th-century Christian heresy ⓘ
Christian theological movement ⓘ
nontrinitarian Christological doctrine ⓘ
associatedWith Arianism ⓘ
classifiedAs heresy by the mainstream church ⓘ
condemnationDate 381 ⓘ
condemnedBy First Council of Constantinople ⓘ
controversy Nicene–Arian controversy ⓘ
linked to: Arian controversy
doctrinalFocus nature and knowability of the divine essence ⓘ
ontological distinction between Father and Son ⓘ
ecclesiasticalStatus followers were excommunicated by Nicene bishops ⓘ
foundedBy Eunomius of Cyzicus ⓘ
geographicRegion Eastern Roman Empire ⓘ
linked to: Byzantine Empire
historicalPeriod 4th century ⓘ
influencedBy Aetius of Antioch ⓘ
keyConcept anomoeanism (unlikeness of the Son to the Father) ⓘ
logical and dialectical theology ⓘ
unbegottenness as unique to the Father ⓘ
language originally articulated in Greek theological writings ⓘ
legacy cited historically as an example of rationalist extremism in theology ⓘ
mainClaim God’s essence can be fully known ⓘ
God’s essence can be precisely defined in human language ⓘ
the Son is of a different substance from the Father ⓘ
namedAfter Eunomius of Cyzicus ⓘ
opposedBy Athanasius of Alexandria ⓘ
Basil of Caesarea ⓘ
Cappadocian Fathers ⓘ
Gregory of Nazianzus ⓘ
Gregory of Nyssa ⓘ
relationToArianism developed from Anomoean Arianism ⓘ
extreme or radical Arianism ⓘ
religiousTradition Christianity ⓘ
scripturalApproach strongly rationalistic exegesis ⓘ
scripturalTextUsed John 17:3 ⓘ
Proverbs 8:22 ⓘ
linked to: Book of Proverbs
theologicalPosition denial of consubstantiality of the Son with the Father ⓘ
emphasis on divine simplicity ⓘ
emphasis on unbegottenness as defining property of God the Father ⓘ
radical form of Arian subordinationism ⓘ
the Son is a created being ⓘ
the Son is unlike the Father in essence ⓘ
viewedAs threat to Nicene orthodoxy ⓘ
viewOnGod God’s essence is identical with being unbegotten ⓘ
viewOnKnowledgeOfGod God can be comprehended by human reason ⓘ
viewOnLanguage divine essence can be captured in a single definition ⓘ
viewOnSon the Son is begotten and therefore not truly God in essence ⓘ
viewOnTrinity rejection of Nicene doctrine of the Trinity ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (11)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Basil of Caesarea → opposed → Eunomianism ⓘ
Canon 1 → condemns → Eunomianism ⓘ
Against Eunomius → opposes → Eunomianism ⓘ
Epiphanius of Salamis → opposedDoctrine → Aetian and Eunomian Anomoeanism ⓘ
linked to: Eunomianism
Eunomius of Cyzicus → religiousTradition → Anomoeanism ⓘ
linked to: Eunomianism
Eunomius of Cyzicus → movement → Eunomianism ⓘ
Eunomius of Cyzicus → influenced → Eunomian sect ⓘ
linked to: Eunomianism
Aetius of Antioch → movement → Anomoeanism ⓘ
linked to: Eunomianism
Aetius of Antioch → movement → Eunomianism ⓘ
Aetius of Antioch → influenced → Eunomianism ⓘ