The Antitrust Paradox

E145247

The Antitrust Paradox is a highly influential 1978 book by legal scholar Robert Bork that reshaped U.S. antitrust law by arguing that its primary goal should be the protection of consumer welfare rather than competitors.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
The Antitrust Paradox canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (44)

Predicate Object
instanceOf book ⓘ
non-fiction book ⓘ
argues antitrust enforcement should protect consumers rather than competitors ⓘ
antitrust law should focus on economic efficiency ⓘ
many antitrust interventions can be counterproductive ⓘ
mergers should be evaluated primarily on consumer welfare effects ⓘ
predatory pricing is rare and difficult to prove ⓘ
vertical restraints are often pro-competitive ⓘ
associatedWithSchool Chicago school of economics ⓘ
author Robert Bork ⓘ
countryOfOrigin United States ⓘ
criticizes Albrecht v. Herald Co. ⓘ
Brown Shoe Co. v. United States ⓘ
Harvard school of antitrust ⓘ
United States v. Von's Grocery Co. ⓘ
structuralist approach to antitrust ⓘ
discusses Clayton Act ⓘ
Federal Trade Commission Act ⓘ
Sherman Antitrust Act ⓘ
field law and economics ⓘ
genre antitrust law literature ⓘ
legal scholarship ⓘ
hasEdition revised edition ⓘ
hasImpactOn Department of Justice antitrust enforcement philosophy ⓘ
Federal Trade Commission antitrust enforcement philosophy ⓘ
Supreme Court antitrust decisions in the United States ⓘ
hasReception controversial among antitrust scholars ⓘ
criticized by proponents of broader antitrust goals ⓘ
highly influential in legal academia ⓘ
influenced Chicago school of antitrust analysis ⓘ
U.S. antitrust jurisprudence ⓘ
ISBN 9780465004773 ⓘ
language English ⓘ
mainSubject antitrust law ⓘ
competition policy ⓘ
consumer welfare standard ⓘ
notableFor popularizing the consumer welfare standard in antitrust ⓘ
shaping Reagan-era antitrust policy ⓘ
proposes consumer welfare as primary goal of antitrust law ⓘ
publicationYear 1978 ⓘ
publisher Basic Books ⓘ
supports more economic analysis in antitrust cases ⓘ
rule of reason over per se rules in many contexts ⓘ
titleMeaning claims that antitrust policy can paradoxically harm competition ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Robert Bork → notableWork → The Antitrust Paradox ⓘ